This blog is part three of a multi-part analysis on the different technical approaches to A/B testing and personalization. In part one and two, we offered a deeper analysis on the most important technical considerations when implementing client-side rendering and server-side rendering. In this post, we will compare the two at a high-level.
General approaches for rendering web pages
When it comes to rendering web pages, there are two broad technical approaches available, each of which has its own performance and experience tradeoffs:
- Client-side rendering
- Server-side rendering
Let’s dig in a little more deeply when it comes to implementing each one.
Rendering options when it comes to A/B testing and personalization
As the web has matured over the years, it has become an essential marketing best practice to both experiment with and personalize the experiences that websites provide their users. Over time, vendors in the space have settled on two primary approaches to A/B testing and personalization:
We’ve summarized the definitions and differences between the approaches below:
Comparing the client-side vs server-side approach
|Relatively quick and easy to deploy, by adding a few lines of code to the page header||Longer time to deploy as it requires thoughtful design and development by your tech team|
Ease of use
|Easy for business users to create experiences using vendor UI. Developers have less control over what is changed on the site.||More difficult for business users to set up (typically requires knowledge of the web application structure and JSON). Higher degree of developer control over site changes.|
|Usually limited to changes on the page itself.||Testing and personalization can incorporate back end systems (such as inventory).|
Impact on Page Load
|There is a minor increase in page footprint and load time.||Personalization is done before the page is rendered, so there is no effect on the served page.|
|Limited to web browsers.||Personalization can be achieved on any device or platform capable of making an API call.|
Now, let’s dig a little deeper into each one.
How client-side testing and personalization works
So, what is client-side rendering?
The page modification technique is the same across all vendors – a piece of code in the SDK performs an action based on the desired use case.
A few client-side rendering examples:
- Injects global CSS styles onto the page, changing the styling of elements on the page
How server-side testing and personalization works
So, what is server-side rendering?
Server-side testing and personalization is typically provided by the vendor in the form of a REST API, which is called from the rendering web application (server) before the page is served. Requests and responses to REST APIs use the JSON format for data, a widely adopted and efficient way of representing data.
In pure server-side integration, your server securely interacts with an API Gateway, passing the details of the page request and asking for relevant personalization experiences.
The response is typically a JSON payload. It is then the caller’s responsibility to parse the response and act on it. You will also need to report back any engagement with the chosen experiences or significant user events. Engagement and events are reported in a similar manner (POST to and API endpoint) to personalization.
Because server-side personalization occurs within your web application stack on the back end, successful implementation requires thoughtful design and development by your tech team.
Server-side rendering use case examples:
- Major structural changes to the page
- Full-page redirects
- Secure access to back end systems (pricing models, real-time inventory)
- Pre-render personalization of Single Page Apps
Which one: client-side vs. server-side?
The longstanding client-side vs. server-side testing debate often concentrates on the question of convenience: which is easiest to integrate and test with?
So while the server-side approach is much more involved, the wider range of capabilities, deeper insights, and overall sophistication compensate for what the method lacks in ease and convenience. After all, delivering truly relevant experiences across the customer journey requires a centralized solution that is able to unify all data sources and activate it, regardless of the channel, device, or web technology the application is served from.
Choosing the correct approach will ultimately depend on your particular needs, technical resources, and long-term vision. If your primary users will be marketers and agility is their first priority, client-side is likely to be the best choice. On the other hand, if your tech and R&D departments will be heavily involved, or if you are planning on more sophisticated integrations, or those beyond the traditional web, server-side may well be the answer.
The simplicity of the API concept means that you don’t necessarily have to make an either/or choice between server and client rendering for personalization. Some modern personalization platforms provide the ability to implement a hybrid solution, in which pre-rendered server-side testing and personalization changes can coexist with traditional client-side testing, and user engagement can be reported to the vendor directly from the browser.
The inevitable shift to APIs
Amid the proliferation of A/B testing and personalization, marketers have more tools than ever at their fingertips. But when looking at the competitive landscape, adopting advanced solutions that offer holistic, cross-channel experiences is not a luxury anymore. Doing so is quickly becoming a must if you wish to continue to effectively engage your audience and meet your KPIs. Given that, it may be time to consider jettisoning client-side testing and migrating to the server.